I would be shocked if Mutiny on the Bounty (1962) is anything other than the same transfer that was on the HD-DVD.
And while my statement is unconfirmed, it makes perfect sense when one thinks of how Warner operates as a corporate entity. We know that an announcement for both formats for Hamlet was imminent in 2007. If something gets public in rumor mills on the 'net it is more than likely well past the HD mastering phase. And when people consider Warner's transfers of that era (2006-2007), by today's standards they are not all that brilliant (though most are more than sufficient for 99.9999% of the population), and a quick trip around message boards will reveal complaints of "softness" of such releases from that era such as 2001: A Space Odyssey, The Searchers, The Wild Bunch, etc. (Not my opinion, personally, but it's out there).
Financially speaking, it seems logical that Warner did not want to go back and start from scratch when they had what they considered a perfectly reasonable master of a film that is not exactly high profile in the business sense. From that perspective I would be forced to agree with them.
So, yes, speculation on my part, but grounded in pretty sound reasoning.
And while my statement is unconfirmed, it makes perfect sense when one thinks of how Warner operates as a corporate entity. We know that an announcement for both formats for Hamlet was imminent in 2007. If something gets public in rumor mills on the 'net it is more than likely well past the HD mastering phase. And when people consider Warner's transfers of that era (2006-2007), by today's standards they are not all that brilliant (though most are more than sufficient for 99.9999% of the population), and a quick trip around message boards will reveal complaints of "softness" of such releases from that era such as 2001: A Space Odyssey, The Searchers, The Wild Bunch, etc. (Not my opinion, personally, but it's out there).
Financially speaking, it seems logical that Warner did not want to go back and start from scratch when they had what they considered a perfectly reasonable master of a film that is not exactly high profile in the business sense. From that perspective I would be forced to agree with them.
So, yes, speculation on my part, but grounded in pretty sound reasoning.