Felix Martinez
Screenwriter
Deleted
Then I suppose any discussion of this "secret individual" is inappropriate in this thread for all the HTF members who cannot know what/who is being discussed.Originally Posted by Robert Harris /t/319347/a-few-words-about-chinatown-in-blu-ray#post_3908552
I would not. He really was their only hope.
RAH
http://www.hometheaterforum.com/t/314925/htf-exclusive-interview-with-ron-smith-vice-president-of-preservation-restoration-at-paramount-picturesOriginally Posted by TonyD /t/319347/a-few-words-about-chinatown-in-blu-ray#post_3908578
That name was mentioned is a post that was deleted by the poster. Seems odd hat the name shouldn't be mentioned. HTF didn't fire him.
Not to get into it, but no one should presume that anyone was "fired" by anyone. That is unfair to all parties involved.Originally Posted by TonyD /t/319347/a-few-words-about-chinatown-in-blu-ray#post_3908578
That name was mentioned is a post that was deleted by the poster. Seems odd hat the name shouldn't be mentioned. HTF didn't fire him.
Here is my take on it....Richard--W said:Stanley Cortez references both of those scenes in the interview referred to, and others. He shot more than two scenes. I wasn't judging one cameraman over the other. Chinatown has the advantage of being photographed by two of the best dp's in the business.
I like the romantic quality of those two shots. They make the harder light in the rest of the film feel harder. There is a kind of continuity in those shots involving the arc of Jake and Mrs. Mulwray's relationship. Cortez's close-ups of Faye Dunaway are classic studio portraiture long after it had gone out of fashion. Cortez tries to capture the mystery of the woman with a hint of her carnality. The difference between Cortez's close-ups of her and Alonzo's is startling.
Yes, there are many fascinating camera set-ups.
One of my favorites is the initial interview at the beginning with Mrs. Mulwray. There are two set-ups in this scene, and both are identical. Jake is in the room with his associate behind him. He drags a chair to the foreground and sits down, facing Mrs. Mulwray. He's looking to the right edge of the screen. Cut to Mrs. Mulwray sitting in her chair, with an associate behind her. She's looking toward screen left, at Jake. Polanksi intercuts between their dialogue, while associates in background listen and react, but he never shows Jake and Mrs. Mulwray in the same shot. They sit within a few feet of each other in the same room having a very personal discussion, yet they couldn't be further apart. This is a subtle way of making the audience feel that something isn't right. Then there is the veil she wears. Why wear a veil indoors.
Of course, it soon transpires she is an imposter, who is setting Jake up. The composition suggests that before the plot confirms it. The brilliance of the execution is that the audience only realizes why the scene is unsettling in retrospect.
Every camera-set up in Chinatown is a clinic.
I also appreciate the darkness of the interiors in contrast to the brightness of the sunny exteriors. Dark, but not so dark we can't see the pictures on the wall or read "7 channels used" scrawled across the map book. I'm hopeful that the Blu-ray transfer will get the darkness of the interiors right, particularly the scene where Jake searches Mr. Mulwray's office and enters Ida Sessions apartment.
I wish somebody could tell me who gave the "love nest" photos to the newspaper. Jake says he didn't do it, and I believe him. So who did? Later he finds "love nest' photos in Ida Sessions apartment. She's dead, and the photos are on the desk. How did she get them? Lt. Escobar accuses Jake of working with Ida Sessions to blackmail Mrs. Mulwray with the photos, but he denies it, and again, I believe him. So who gave Jake's "love nest" photos to Ida Sessions and to the press?
Does anybody know?
Guess I'm with you in the 99% club.David Weicker said:I have pre-ordered this. I've also looked at the DVD Beaver review. I have a feeling I fall into RAH's 99% and will probably love this.