What's new

70s Miles Davis and fusion: brilliant or boring? (1 Viewer)

Mike Broadman

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2001
Messages
4,950
Yep, I've decided to bring up an old argument in the music world. Though I've listened to Bitches Brew and In A Silent Way for a while now, I've just started to get into some of Miles' work after that. Live-Evil, Black Beauty, and today I picked up On The Corner.

This stuff is quite daunting. It certainly has a lot of energy, you can't deny that. On the one hand, a lot of it seems incredibly simple, something I'm not used to from Miles. Yet, it can be very hard to listen to. Overall, though, I'm enjoying it. It's very hypnotic. I find that I like it more if I listen more passively. That is, with his acoustic music, I really dig in to it and like to snap up all the little details. With the electric stuff, it sounds better if I take it as a whole, greater than the sum of its parts.

And there are lots of crazy noises.

NP: Frank Zappa, Civilisation Phase III , CD, which is also some really weird and confusing stuff.
 

Frank_S

Supporting Actor
Joined
Oct 28, 1999
Messages
565
Mike, I really enjoy Miles Davis a lot, I have a lot of his earlier stuff.

All of my Jazz material is on vinyl, it sounds simply amazing. If you enjoy Jazz, check out a great Tenor sax player, Gene Ammons-Boss Tenor album, or Johnnie Griffin-The little Giant. Don't forget Sonny Rollins and John Coltrane.
 

Zen Butler

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2002
Messages
5,568
Location
Southern, Ca
Real Name
Zen K. Butler
I have the Special Edition(anniversary) of Bitches Brew, that is about as far as I have went with him. I have always found this album both brilliant and important. He IS the birth of modern fusion. Without that album, there wouldn't be Return to Forever or Weather Report. I feel it had that much impact (imo, of course).

really dig in to it and like to snap up all the little details. With the electric stuff, it sounds better if I take it as a whole, greater than the sum of its parts.
Does make me want to check out some of the later stuff.
 

Chris Madalena

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Mar 6, 2001
Messages
126
Hey Mike,

Check out the "Tribute to Jack Johnson" cd. It's pretty good. I believe John McLaughlin is on there. There's also a cd out called "Panthalassa: The Music of Miles Davis 1969-1974" by Bill Laswell. It's a "remix" of that period's recordings. He does it in a very tasteful way. I love it, and every Miles fan I've played it for loves it too.

N.P. Bill Bruford's Earthworks- "Footloose and Fancy Free Live in London." AWESOME!!
 

Mike Broadman

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2001
Messages
4,950
Chris, I actually just got the Jack Johnson the other day. The first track is really nice, the second is a little slow.

I do plan on getting the remix CD, but after getting the regular albums first.

The SACD of Live-Evil is cool and I will get the Black Beauty SACD also (I already have the regular CD).

I also plan on getting the Earthworks CDs, as I'm starting to collect as much as I can from DGM. There's also a DVD out.

Goddamn, why is there so much good music out there?!

NP: Frank Zappa, The Perfect Stranger, CD
 

Chris Madalena

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Mar 6, 2001
Messages
126
Mike, I can't wait for that Bruford DVD to arrive in my mailbox!! I don't think it comes out til the 23rd. I'd RUN to the store and buy the new earthworks disc. It's my new favorite jazz cd in a long time. Great recording and spectacular performance. Best 20 bucks I've spent in weeks.
:D
 

PaulHeroy

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Nov 24, 2001
Messages
186
One word: Agharta. And Pangaea.
Ok, two words: Agharta, Pangaea. And... nah, no Monty Python today. :)
These 2 recordings, both 2 CD live sets like many of the 70's releases from Miles, were made in Japan in 1975 just before Miles "retired" for 5 years. They are uber fusion, a mix of funk/rock/African/jazz/minimalist groove that has often been admired, sometimes attempted but never matched. IMO, natch. There are many jazz fans and Miles fans who draw a line at 1969: thou shalt have no electric instruments. Horse pucky, say I; he still made incredible music from 1969-1975. The real line is 1980, when he just played pop songs and other people's compositions because of disagreements with record companies.
Anyway, yeah. I love 70's Miles. I'm not a purist, and this era is about as mongrel as it gets, but it's filled with gems. The worst I can say is that 3-4 steps removed there was some pretty lame fusion that come out, and then it got watered down even more and spawned that abomination hellmusic, "smooth jazz".
Interestingly enough, there has been a resurgence in the last 5 years of electronics being used by jazz musicians coming from the traditional side of jazz. Medeski Martin & Wood is the archetype; I was just talking to a friend about how their association with the "jam band" scene leads some to write them off as a strictly groove/jam band, but they are seriously so much more. (Check their Live at Tonic CD on Blue Note, which ranges from boppish to soul jazz to Cecil Taylor and more.) And I think it all goes back to Miles opening that door, grooving and mixing different elements that you're "not supposed" to mix, but showing that there was something appealing to both the booty and the brain.
That's my ramble and I'm sticking to it! :D
 

Mike Broadman

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2001
Messages
4,950
spawned that abomination hellmusic, "smooth jazz".
:laugh: Being a jazz snob is fun, ain't it?
Yeah, a lot of the fusion in the late 70s and 80s was just cringe-inducingly awful. It's a great example of how something becoming too popular too quickly can ruin it.
I will get Aghartha and Pangea eventually. There's a really nice looking Fillmore East double disc I also want to get, as well as Big Fun and a couple other things. I'm also filling in the gaps of the pre-69 era. Is the post-80s stuff really that bad, though?
Schumann, Symphonies 1 & 3, SACD
 

PaulHeroy

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Nov 24, 2001
Messages
186
Is the post-80s stuff really that bad, though?
I'm not terribly familiar with it except for hearing a few of the earlier albums like like You're Under Arrest, Decoy and Tutu. Mostly too "pop" fusion for my taste. My sense is that he spent 5 years as a recluse, indulging in drugs, women and whatever else, and afterwards he just wasn't the same. While neither the 70's nor the 80's/90's music are straight ahead jazz, he gradually stopped playing his music after the 1975-80 break. Some of this also had to do with his attitude toward the record industry, which he felt stole his music. Especially around the time he switched from Columbia to Warner Brothers in the mid 80's he seemed to play mostly pop songs (e.g. Cyndi Lauper's "Time After Time", Michael Jackson's "Human Nature") and other people's compositions (notably Marcus Miller). Miles is still Miles in his playing (well, after the atrocious The Man With the Horn, his first comeback recording), and there were some pretty good versions of his bands. He was still a great talent finder, so you have people like John Scofield and Kenny Garrett coming up through Miles in the 80's.
I'm certainly no expert on that era, from what I hear probably the best one to check out is Amandla. There's a live release that some folks like, something like Live Around the World, but I haven't heard much of it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Forum statistics

Threads
357,057
Messages
5,129,750
Members
144,281
Latest member
acinstallation240
Recent bookmarks
0
Top