3G brand 42" plasma being advertised for $1399, with free shipping. The ad says that it's HD, not ED. Did a search and didn't a previous thread on this.
Thats why I'm holding off on buying it. Im waiting for a review or whatnot. $1400 is still $1400. and to me thats a pretty expensive bedroom tv (which is what I'd use it for mostly).
It would be the first 4:3 plasma I've ever seen, and I've seen them all.
Right now the best bargain PLASMA 42" wise is the new Panasonic TH42PX50U, at Circuit City for $3199. Stunning picture, NICE blacks (especially for a plasma). True HiDef picture. DVDs look GREAT.
PS: BAN EDTV! It can't even properly reproduce DVD! What a rip.
1024 x 768 is considered "HD" because of the vertical resolution, but I wouldn't say it's "true" HD though either. But that is mostly what you get these days with any LCD or plasma that does 720 (or 768p) vertically.
Shoot, I think 1980x1080 is true HD so it would have to be 1408x768p (or 1320x720p) to be true HD then. Right?
Although 1980/1080 = 1.8333 whereas 16/9 is 1.777. So maybe it depends on the aspect ratio of the pixel too.
Hey Sami, what you are forgetting is that Plasma pixels are rectangular, NOT square like LCD, therefore the resolution is a 16:9 resolution, rather than a 4:3
No I'm not, that's what I was referring to in the AVS thread. You're better off feeding it non-native signal, otherwise the picture is going to be distorted. Let the internal processor handle the image coding.