1776 playing in Santa Monica tomorrow

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Moe Dickstein, Jul 2, 2013.

  1. Jack P

    Jack P Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    3,860
    Likes Received:
    1,099
    Well John you don't have the right to speak as the arbiter of taste on the value of the Overture/Intermission as you presumed to do with your bewilderment that "anyone" could have a contrary opinion to your own on the subject. So I suggest you learn to practice what you preach. Your post helped change my attitude from "maybe I'll get it for archival reasons" to no sale.
     
  2. Mike Frezon

    Mike Frezon Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2001
    Messages:
    38,196
    Likes Received:
    5,598
    Location:
    Rensselaer, NY
    All right, everyone.

    Let's just take a deep breath now.

    We all are passionate about this film. And we can passionately disagree. But let's keep the discussions about the film and not about the people making posts about the film.

    And, let's keep in mind that this is a release that is still a ways from being fully realized.
     
    Moe Dickstein and Douglas R like this.
  3. Ethan Riley

    Ethan Riley Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,582
    Likes Received:
    348
    Blythe Danner is way hotter than Betty Buckley.
     
    bujaki likes this.
  4. ahollis

    ahollis Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    6,545
    Likes Received:
    1,515
    Location:
    New Orleans
    Real Name:
    Allen
    I believe in a an issue of Perfect Vision Magazine Joe Caps stated that he included the overture, Intermission and Entr'acte in 1776 laserdisc and that it was never intended for the theatrical release. He said he used stems to create the overture. While I think it was enjoyable this is certainly not an issue to get hot about. This is just my opinion I will welcome any Blu-ray that Sony and Mr. Hunt release.And yes Miss Danner is hot, especially in Philadelphia.
     
    David_B_K and Moe Dickstein like this.
  5. haineshisway

    haineshisway Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    3,165
    Likes Received:
    2,217
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    Bruce
    What a presumptuous post this is. Horrifying really. Mr. Hunt directed the stage version of 1776 and he directed the film version. Not you, not Joe C. - if an overture was never intended for this film, if no intermission was ever intended (the stage show had none and the show does not work with one inserted and I've seen many productions - the ones that insert the intermission have NEVER worked because it interrupts the show of its forward momentum at exactly the time it can't - people who add the intermission do so for venal reasons - to sell their little drinks and trinkets) who exactly do you think you ARE demanding these things? Oh, I forgot that we live in the land of entitlement. Mr. Hunt seems very willing to have his preferred cut and another which puts back a lot of stuff for the "fans". That seems most reasonable. But if he says no overture (there was NEVER EVER an overture for this film) and no intermission - that's it. The End. Mr. Hunt is as much responsible for 1776 being the surprising hit it was as are the authors. As Moe says, and as Mr. Hunt's brother Gordon has confirmed to me, this was a very unworkable piece before Mr. Hunt's involvement and he shaped it and worked with the authors to get it to the place where it was a success. If I were Mr. Hunt and saw your post I would simply say, "Screw it - do my cut and forget the rest because there will never be any pleasing these people. Since Mr. Hunt was there at the beginning, I think we should all allow him to present his film as he sees fit - the fact that he's willing - WILLING - to allow some other version is very nice of him and everyone should be saying "Thank you, Mr. Hunt" rather than making with these kinds of completely off-putting posts.
     
  6. JohnMor

    JohnMor Producer
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2004
    Messages:
    4,065
    Likes Received:
    1,296
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Real Name:
    John Moreland
    No, there is a difference here, Jack. As you stated, I expressed my bewilderment. My personal bewilderment. At no time did I say that "the home theater viewer" or "Hunt" (or any of the other creators of the piece) shared my bewilderment or had to share my bewilderment. I spoke only for myself.
     
  7. Jack P

    Jack P Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    3,860
    Likes Received:
    1,099
    No John, there is no difference. You presumed *your* standard to be the one for "ANY" fan of the musical regarding the presence of the Overture/Intermission and how one felt about it Your words were "I don't see how any fan of the show and/or the film could want an Overture and Intermission". That is a presumption of arrogance of the highest order that those who like it are not somehow true, legitimate fans of the musical and were you a practitioner of what you preached, you would not have so framed it in the terms you did. Spare me your hypocrisy, it doesn't become you.
     
  8. Jack P

    Jack P Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    3,860
    Likes Received:
    1,099
    *****Who exactly do you think you ARE demanding these things?***

    A paying member of the public who is somehow expected to shell out his money for the end product. I have my right under the First Amendment to express that perspective, and I have done so and I make no apology for doing so, least of all to a person who finds it "horrifying" to see the First Amendment in action.
     
  9. JohnMor

    JohnMor Producer
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2004
    Messages:
    4,065
    Likes Received:
    1,296
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Real Name:
    John Moreland
    That's right: I don't see how any fan... MY opinion. No one else's. I didn't say "No fan of the show would ever like..." Again, and for the last time, there is a difference. As far as the name calling, it's just sad.
     
    Craig S likes this.
  10. Jack P

    Jack P Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    3,860
    Likes Received:
    1,099
    There is a world of difference between saying, "In my opinion, I don't think an overture helps the film or enhances it" as opposed to "I don't see how any fan of the musical could like one". If you're not capable of recognizing the difference, I will leave that to be your problem.

    I've only defended the presence of a version of the film that was previously made available in a home video format. That was my perspective on "Major Dundee", it is my perspective on "It's A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World" and it remains my perspective for a film I enjoy more than the other two. I won't apologize for enjoying that version of the film. If there are others who wish to make enjoyment of that version of the film a great crime against humanity, that must be their problem as well.
     
  11. haineshisway

    haineshisway Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    3,165
    Likes Received:
    2,217
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    Bruce
    The First Amendment. Maybe you should try a career in comedy. How many times do you have to make the same post - how many words to you have to expend saying the same thing over and over again? Say it once and move along. Here is what your right is as a paying member of the public - pay or don't pay. You've said your piece here and elsewhere hundreds of times. To even bring up the First Amendment is so perverse it defies belief. And to be specific, I find your sense of entitlement horrifying. Under the First Amendment, I believe I have the "right" to find your sense of entitlement and your hundreds of posts on this subject off-putting, and therefore, under the First Amendment, I am so stating.
     
    Craig S, Professor Echo and TravisR like this.
  12. Ejanss

    Ejanss Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2012
    Messages:
    2,452
    Likes Received:
    375
    Real Name:
    EricJ
    Uh, actually you don't--In fact, it's most of the "entitled" folk who use "First Amendment" when people tell them they can't get what they want, who would be the most "horrified". (And heehee, I love to see their faces when they are.... :D )
    1A states that Congress will make no law to directly abridge the owner of speech--Meaning, that Nixon couldn't tell Sony to pull out the Cool Men number by Congressional order just because he didn't like it, but that didn't mean the audience could "demand" to see it. Columbia owned the movie, and the audience could shut up and watch it.
    If you stand on a streetcorner and protest, as long as it isn't anyone else's streetcorner (ie. a park and not some business's sidewalk), no cop can bother you, but if you do it in the lobby of an office, security can have you escorted outside. (It's THEIR building.)
    If you're an editor for a newspaper, the White House can't shut you down for writing critical editorials, but if a reporter turns in a false or offensive story, the editor or publisher can fire him for it. (It's THEIR paper.)

    But anyway, sorry, where was I? Oh yes--Peter Hunt and Columbia. It's THEIR movie.
     
  13. Jack P

    Jack P Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    3,860
    Likes Received:
    1,099
    (Yawn).
     
  14. Ejanss

    Ejanss Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2012
    Messages:
    2,452
    Likes Received:
    375
    Real Name:
    EricJ
    (Hey, what a coincidence! That's exactly what my cat says, when I tell him to get off the bed! :P )
     
  15. haineshisway

    haineshisway Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    3,165
    Likes Received:
    2,217
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    Bruce
    Of course "yawn." What else can you say?
     
  16. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    29,324
    Likes Received:
    4,689
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    Let's stop the disruption of this thread now! A previous warning has already been issued by another moderator. I hope further action isn't necessary to enforce those warnings. Thank you.
     
  17. jim_falconer

    jim_falconer Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    645
    Likes Received:
    218
    Completely agree Robert. There are those of us who want the LD version released (kitchen sink, so to speak), and other's who are not as passionate about it. No need to have name calling.
     
    Jack P likes this.
  18. JohnMor

    JohnMor Producer
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2004
    Messages:
    4,065
    Likes Received:
    1,296
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Real Name:
    John Moreland
    I just want to be clear: my desire to see the dvd version on blu was not IN PLACE of the planned full(er) package. Only if that one was never going to happen. I don't do streaming and downloading of my films and music, so I'd love to have this film in HD and blu is it. I certainly hope the planned blu ray comes to pass!
     
  19. Joe Caps

    Joe Caps Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2000
    Messages:
    1,977
    Likes Received:
    47
    Hello, I am Joe Caporiccio. I was responsible for the laserdisc version of 1776.

    It all started when I was trying to find the missin Cool Considerate Men.

    I first found two short bits makred Martha Jefferson at window and Jefferson and child.

    I showed these to Peter Hunt and asked what they were. "Oh, that's from the long version of the film" Howlong - he said around three hours. He asked me then and there if I could put the entire version back together. I didn't know if it was possible, but I said that I would try.

    Then meeting with Pioneer legal. Anything put back into the film would haveto be approved by Peter Hunt and Sony legal.

    Comncerning the Overture - one for the film was certainly planned by Ray Heindorf. He outlined in a long memo what he planned to include. I followed his plan by editing pieces already in the film.
    the folks in Sony music legal said it was fine as long as all music had actually already been used in the film. It was paid for and there was no reuse fees required as it was still being used for its original use - as part of the film.
    Everything I did was scrutinized by Hunt and by Pioneer legal and Sony legal.

    As for restoring both Overture and Intermission pieces to a new blu ray - why not? they can be easily skipped over, for those who do not wish to hear them.

    As for the new mix sounding better than the one I did ?? I think not, the newer miz vequently sounding thin and pale in comparison.
     
    Jack P likes this.
  20. Jack P

    Jack P Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    3,860
    Likes Received:
    1,099
    Thanks for offering your take on events, Joe.
     

Share This Page