Search results

So the latest technology highlights and magnifies the flaws. I find viewing the standard DVD of the "Reconstruction Version" less distracting and an overall more enjoyable experience.

Worth experiencing for it's inventive use of slang alone, but there's so much more.

I, too, prefer the "Preview" version over the "Reconstructed" version. I just don't understand WHY the blu-ray of the "Reconstructed" version looks so much worse in four lengthy sections than the standard 2008 DVD. There may be subtle lines on other versions but they're not so GLARING/JARRING. I...

All I can say is compare the effected sections yourself. The "50th Anniversary Edition" DVD(s) and the "Limited Edition" blu-ray. Then explain why (if you agree the blu-ray looks SO much worse) the problems couldn't be corrected.

Yes. I played the blu-ray on two different systems and it looked the same. I also considered that maybe I had a defective disc but I have come across a few consumer comments that mention the problem and express the same bafflement with the critic's silence on this issue.

I don't see how anyone can prefer the inconsistent video quality of the blu-ray release of "Touch Of Evil" over the standard DVD. The Reconstructed Version on the blu-ray is marred by several lengthy segments filled with DOZENS of BRIGHT vertical lines...lines SO BRIGHT they stand out against...