Search results

I have to agree with many of the voices here that cry out against throwing money away in the interest of being guinea pigs to an upgrade that has yet to define itself. Whether one can afford to do so or not, it's a question of principle (paraphrasing Mike G above). I love film and I love the...

They just don't "make 'em like dear old Dad used to make 'em" anymore... Anyways, I was just looking into buying this disc and stumbled onto this thread. Seems more like a sad, sad, sad, sad world when films die an unnecessary death; it's shameful that somebody or some organization close to...

I vote for a Nicol Williamson box set! Let's see, Seven Percent Solution, a new SE Excalibur, and anything else not currently available that has him in a major role (ownership be damned ;-) ). Looks like he hasn't appeared on film since Spawn back in 1997? Strange that he resurfaced in that kind...

I have to agree with Matt, in that such comments sound exceedingly strange considering the film maker. I recently enjoyed listening to the commentary on the DVD, and the director seems very much invested in the picture; to suggest that he simply "made it for the money" and was not otherwise...

I've heard that the initial DVD release will be the US cut, which was shortened by the director following the film's original release. However, I've also heard that Malick is working on a much longer DVD presentation for release sometime down the line. Just curious if anyone has additional...

Jack, I believe that the Warner chat transcript answers yes on your EWS question; good news! CLD

September 5th! That's the first time I've heard of the actual release date for these discs; can't wait. As a huge Kubrick follower / fan, any new presentations of his work are always greatly appreciated. In regards to the way in which he shot and presented his work, I always feel that it's...

(Speaking as Hal) Yes Dave, I understand. (done speaking as Hal) Just for more food for thought, here is even more on the subject; it speaks to the "whys" a bit: It is odd, in that Kubrick knew that it would indeed be 1.85:1 when shown theatrically, but there you have it. Note that...

And here's a bit more in regards to Kubrick's love for using full frame over 1.85:1... This is why the DVDs for those films were released full screen: it gave Kubrick the chance to present each of the three films as he prefered, without the restrictions of the 1.85:1 theatrical...

Just a note on the Clockwork Orange ratio: it will be anamorphic, but with black bars on the left and right sides, as the film was shot and shown 1.66:1. I quoted an interview with Kubrick's long time assistant, Leon Vitali, in another thread concerning this issue. Here is a short excerpt:

As is the case with most material goods, it is often more beneficial to simply donate the products to charity (hospitals, group homes, good will, etc.) and then take a tax write-off. You'll probably see a better return, and you'll be doing something for those in need, which is the best part.

As an aside, I had the opportunity to see the original theatrical cut on the big screen a few years back, before the existence of the "Director's Cut". I found that seeing the film in the theater was profoundly different from my experiences watching it on home video, but not for the normal...

Very depressing; I was hoping that this would be something of a grail for the film at this time. Thanks to you both for taking the chance and sharing your reactions! Now let's storm the gates of Paramount and hold them accountable for ignoring this masterpiece!!!

Coppola top 10 list: 10 Peggy Sue Got Married 9 Godfather 3 8 Dracula 7 Tucker 6 Rumble Fish 5 Outsiders 4 Conversation 3 Godfather 2 Godfather 2 1 Apocalypse Now

Hawks top 10 list: 10 Man's favorite Sport 9 Gentlemen Prefer Blondes 8 To Have & Have Not 7 Big Sleep 6 His Girl Friday 5 Red River 4 Air Force 3 Only Angels Have Wings 2 Twentieth Century 1 Rio Bravo

Scorsese top 10 list: 10 Gangs of New York 9 Mean Streets 8 Age of Innocence 7 Aviator 6 Casino 5 King of Comedy 4 Cape Fear 3 Raging Bull 2 Good Fellas 1 Taxi Driver

Here is a thought that I haven't seen mentioned as of yet: now that consumers are becoming used to watching films and television programs on devices that have very small screens, such as cell phones and portable video game devices, why would they be inspired by a new format that really only...

I believe the key here is "protect the full 1.33 area"; that was what the director wanted, but he knew that it would be exhibited theatrically at 1.85, hence the note. CLD

Patrick, you are essentially calling the person who is perhaps THE greatest surviving Kubrick authority a liar. Of course, you are entitled to your opinion, but I feel that, in any case, Mr. Vitali is a far more superior source on these matters than you are. I suggest that you do some homework...

That image is a perfect illustration of Vitali's point: Kubrick shot full frame and understood that he would need to matte to 1.85:1 for theatrical release. Thanks for showing that; totally awesome to see! By the way, the notion that Vitali has no idea what he's talking about is quite...

Mr. Vitali was speaking of A Clockwork Orange at that point, which was intended for a 1.66:1 theatrical display. The later films (The Shining, Full Metal Jacket, and Eyes Wide Shut) were shot for full frame and then matted to 1.85:1 for theatrical display. As the exhibitors moved towards the...

David, I think you will find this of interest. In regards to the theatrical presentations, here is Leon Vitali's response (second paragraph in particular): Vitali first met Kubrick when he won the role of Lord Bullingdon in Barry Lyndon. After that experience, Vitali decided that he would...

Fantastic news about the Kubrick films: has there been any indication as to when they will be released or what they will contain? I have been trying to find anything on these releases from Leon Vitale, but to no avail. I suppose the biggest question, as always, will be "will The Shining and Eyes...

I agree: Broken Flowers and the two cuts of Dune. Start with the theatrical cut and then compare and contrast it against the extended cut. I suppose the question that I would want answered is which is the better film and why. Finally, is Dune a good film in either version? I haven't seen it in...

The Matrix: the surprisingly fresh edition The Matrix Reloaded: the surprisingly average edition The Matrix Revolutions: the surprisingly awful edition CLD

How would a film like One Eyed Jacks even get onto the general radar for restoration towards the end of a new DVD release? I assume the primary mover would be the prospect of revenue, but there must be secondary necessities, such as the availability of film elements and their state of decay...

Vacation: the "This is crazy, this is crazy, this is crazy!" edition Christmas Vacation: the "Squirrel!!!" edition European Vacation: the "Those bells haven't rung for years!" edition Funny Farm: the Lamb Fries edition Caddy Shack: the "You'll get nothing and like it!" edition...

HA HA HA; perfect additions! By the way, I've always felt that the 1992 John Landis vampire film Innocent Blood should simply be titled "Loggia Runs Amuck"; he steals the show, and the performance is just hilarious. So without further ado: Loggia Runs Amuck: the more amuck for your buck...

In regards to the recent trend of adding self-referential descriptives to new, special editions of DVDs, I am of the opinion that, while momentarily amusing, these descriptives simply conrtibute to more poor and annoying cover artwork. I always prefer original theatrical advertising materials...

That's a great idea Richard; I think that such a release would be a hell of a lot of fun. That has to be the most energized performance of William Hurt's career. I wish that Hurt was still commanding leading roles: who can forget his brilliance in Children of a Lesser God and Kiss of the Spider...