Search results

Funny, as I have been wanting to purchase this for awhile and actually checked DeepDiscountDVD to see if they had it for cheaper than the absolutely absurd price it is selling every where else. It wasn't listed. I also got the e-mail, and once again it's not listed. When I go to the page it...

Didn't we have admins deleting posts and threatening to ban members of the forum in the "Fahrenheit 9/11" and "Outfoxed" DVD threads when people started criticizing the films and their makers?

Thanks. I'll be picking it up in that case.

I own the first three seasons of Oz but there was a question I had about the fourth season, but I couldn't find any reviews anywhere. Anyway, the first three seasons were 8 hours a piece and were on three discs. The fourth season is twice the length (16 hours), but, as far as I can tell, is...

I was JUST about to type that. Heh.

double post. sorry.

It is two DVDs plus the soundtrack CD.

Oh well, of course, because all TV-DVDs cost the same to produce and are priced the same. Right?

Yes, quite a struggle Moore had to release the picture. By 'struggle', I assume you mean "1. The instance in which a huge corporation gives someone $6 million to produce a film, then tells them a year before the release date that they will need to find a new distributor, which said filmmaker does."

This REALLY pisses me off. I got screwed on "Meaning of Life" because I didnt read the reviews but I read the reviews on all the major sites and NO ONE MENTIONED IT! Do DVD reviewers even pay attention to what they are watching? I am really irritated.

I wrote above that I had no problem with DigitalBits doing this, as they need to pay their bandwidth bills and whatnot. This, however, is a whole different story:

The only thing that really ticks me off about these ads is getting ones for products that I've already bought. IMDB has been waging a full out assault on my computer letting me know that Clerks 10th Anniversary, which I have already purchased, is now on DVD.

So it's not a digipack? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

What you dont mention is that TvShowsOnDvd also says that it was shot for 1.37:1.

I'm sorry, I did not mean to say that the widescreen version was cropped but that it simply was not the correct aspect ratio. It probably does have more information on the sides which means that although it was shot in widescreen it was intended for 1.37:1, similar to how 1.85 films will be shot...

Matt: your review incorrectly states that the widescreen version is the original aspect ratio. It is not. It was filmed in the 1.37 aspect ratio so the widescreen version is cropped. http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/newsitem.cfm?NewsID=1564

Unless the back of the box still has the special features listed and there's still a "special edition" banner on the new releases, no.

Besides compressing the video to death by including a completely worthless video commentary (I watched this for the opening ten minutes and got about 45 seconds of comments by Cage and someone else that were obviously just interview material that didn't make the featurettes) encoded at the same...

I think it's probably another example of Lion's Gate being a completely mindless company than them trying to milk customers out of their money. To say that would be actually giving Lion's Gate some sort of credit. Their obvious goal is to make as little money as humanly possible or maybe even...

No, they will be. Fox was originally contemplating not putting them on the original release in order to make the new release look even better in comparison.

Actually I believe that there argument is not against the upcoming new edition itself but simply that there was a previous release before. Originally Fox was going to strip the commentary tracks from the first release to make the unrated version look even better when it came out. Basically this...

Yeah, it was just released and already there has been a second edition announced. Sony would look ridiculous advertising a third version to come out just weeks after the second version. Not that they don't look ridiculous in the first place...

Matt: I believe all of Warner's 2-disc digipack editions have been shown as being in keep-cases in press images, but they all later turned up in digipacks. Warner seems to be inconsistent about press images and the actual packaging. I recall seeing many Warner press images shown in keep-cases...

Would neither be okay? :)

It was a joke.

I'm buying it just for the "Like Mike" trailer. :) I don't think I've ever seen the actual individual trailers listed in a DVD announcement. Ah, probably just to pad it out since the only real extras on the disc are the commentary and the music video for that god-awful song they played about...

The first disc of "From Earth to the Moon."

I can't find any info (other than release date) on the Region 1 release but I'd expect it to be similar to the Region 2 and 4 discs, which were released this year. They were 2.35:1 Anamporhic Widescreen with Dolby 2.0 Stereo. Barebones, unfortunately. Region 4 cover (same as Region 2...

That is absolutely horrid. When will Miramax realize that there are many people who watch DVDs that do not use 20" screens? Forget that. Edge enhancement like this is noticeable even on smaller screens. I saw "Giant" (WB title, but it's still relative) on a 27" screen sitting relatively far...

I don't think Lynda is joking. Checking her posting history it seems she first posted in this forum two days ago. Let's educate--not bash and ridicule. If she doesn't get it after awhile then you have my permission to beat her. :)