-

Jump to content



DVD & Blu-ray Deals

Sale!
  • Today's Best Blu-ray Deals See the latest Blu-ray deals & price drops See The Best Deals

  • Search Reviews


    #

    DVD & Blu-ray Reviews

    • Maleficent Blu-ray Review
      Yesterday, 02:17 PM
      An alternative point of view retelling of the Sleeping Beauty fairy tale, Robert Stromberg’s Maleficent might not quite have the enchantment and delicate mag... Read More
    • The Vincent Price Collection II Blu-ray Review
      Yesterday, 07:29 PM
      Just in time for Halloween, Scream Factory follows up its excellent and entertaining box set The Vincent Price Collection with a box set of seven more films... Read More
    • The Lieutenant Wore Skirts DVD Review
      Yesterday, 03:40 AM
      After scoring a hit recreating his Tony-winning Broadway role in the movie version of The Seven-Year Itch (though its popularity was probably more ascribed t... Read More
    • Edge of Tomorrow Blu-ray Review
      Oct 21 2014 06:33 PM
      No, you’re not caught in a time loop. This is indeed a third – almost entirely different – HTF review of Doug Liman’s sci-fi action film starring Tom Cruise... Read More

    Hardware Reviews


    - - - - -

    Man in the Dark 3D Blu-ray Review

    Blu-ray 3D Blu-ray Sony Pictures Twilight Time

    Jan 18 2014 04:01 PM | Matt Hough in DVD & Blu-ray Reviews
    Shot in just a few days to get its 3D images on the screen before any other major studio of the era, Lew Landers’ Man in the Dark is only a mediocre noir drama but a wonderful 3D experience. Those looking for in-depth characterizations or trailblazing action won’t find a lot to recommend with this quickie thriller, but those looking for a first-rate 3D feature will enjoy all facets of its make-up: the depth of image, the always interesting placement of props and people within the frame, and the numerous forward projections some of which startle with their quickness and impact.

    Title Info:

    • Studio: Sony
    • Distributed By: Twilight Time
    • Video Resolution: 1080P/AVC, 1080P/MVC
    • Aspect Ratio: 1.33:1
    • Audio: English 1.0 DTS-HDMA (Mono)
    • Subtitles: English SDH
    • Rating: Not Rated
    • Run Time: 1 Hr. 7 Min.
    • Package Includes: 3D Blu-ray
    • Case Type: keep case
    • Disc Type: BD50 (dual layer)
    • Region: All
    • Release Date: 01/21/2013
    • MSRP: $29.95

    The Production Rating: 3/5

    Career criminal Steve Rawley (Edmond O’Brien) and his gang have stolen $130,000, and Steve has hidden it where no one, not even his faithful girl friend Peg (Audrey Totter), knows where it is. In order to get out of jail long before his robbery conviction sentence is over, Steve submits to an experimental brain operation by Dr. Marston (Dayton Lummis) which will remove the part of the brain which controls his malevolent behavior. The operation is a success, but it leaves him with complete amnesia; he doesn’t even remember his real name. His former gang (Ted de Corsia, Horace McMahon, Nick Dennis), unhappy that he hasn’t shared the location of the stolen loot, abducts him and attempts to coax the information out of him not believing his protests of ignorance about his identity or the location of the money. Insurance investigator Jawald (Dan Riss) locates the gang’s hideout before the police and waits for Rawley and company to make a move. Sure enough, a series of nightmares gives Rawley enough clues to begin his own investigation for the money's location though Peg, ever the trusty companion, begs Steve to forget the ill-gotten gains and simply begin a new life with her.

    A remake of the 1936 film The Man Who Lived Twice, Man in the Dark has interesting plot and character points that due to the small budget and hasty filming schedule simply aren’t developed in the George Bricker-Jack Leonard screenplay (for example: is it pure greed for the money or his true criminal nature reemerging that causes Steve to revert to the tough cookie he was before the operation in the film’s final reels; is it the love of a good woman or the lack of that criminal part of his brain that allows him to make the decision he makes in the final shots?). With the film being shot so quickly, director Lew Landers didn’t have much opportunity for visual imagination, but one of Steve’s nightmares is rather stylishly designed and shot with an off-kilter camera and the disturbing, garish images at a carnival which can sometimes rightly be relegated to one’s bad dreams making it not only the most visually interesting of the film’s sequences but also offering up some solid clues to the solution of the film’s mystery. The mystery of the hidden money is another facet of the story that isn’t milked for all it could have been, but it will hold one’s attention long enough to enjoy the numerous 3D tomfoolery that gives the picture its real distinction. The film’s climactic sequence on a roller coaster doesn’t manage to wring all of the dramatic and cinematic possibilities out of its setting (for one thing, we aren’t always sure who each of the characters is when the filming is done from below the actors), but it has its moments.

    Though four years older than the character he’s playing in the movie (and actually looking a bit older than thirty-eight), Edmund O’Brien is by far the most impressive performer in the movie as Steve Rawley. He offers both a tough criminal type and a rather milquetoast alternative after the operation (though he certainly remembers how to use his fists quickly enough later in the movie), and his characterization is complex enough for the viewer not to really be sure where he’s going to land by film’s end. Audrey Totter gets to play tipsy in a bar scene but otherwise acts the faithful moll without much imagination. Ted de Corsia plays a stereotypical heavy without much flair either, but John Harmon and Ruth Warren have some good back-and-forth insult dialogue as a battling couple at the carnival.

    Video Rating: 4.5/5 3D Rating: 5/5

    The film’s original 1.33:1 theatrical aspect ratio is replicated in this 1080p transfer using the MVC/AVC codec (the disc offers both 2D and 3D encodes). The image is pristine with no signs of age anyway apart from some occasional lighter bands at the right edge of the frame. Grayscale is outstanding with nice black levels and levels of gray that are impressive even when viewed through polarized glasses. Sharpness is also excellent: details in facial features, hair, and clothes are easily seen. The film has been divided into 12 chapters.

    As another of the Golden Age 3D films which found many opportunities to utilize the medium within the film’s story, the 3D here is terrific and features no significant problems with ghosting. Though the depth offered with the process makes Steve’s hospital room seem rather gigantic, the expansion of all of the indoor sets allows the director to place people and props in interesting arrays always offering a stereoscopic experience that makes the 3D transfer the go-to version of the film for home viewing. And the forward projections are numerous and fun: sometimes surprising (a man falling from a great height in your face will likely make you jump; spiders and birds, fists and guns and the surgical instruments used during the operation are all thrust forward) and sometimes just a matter of the photography (a tree branch unobtrusively protrudes outward near the film’s beginning). Some may call it gimmicky (a roller coaster sequence near the film’s climax using obvious rear projection tries to beat This Is Cinerama at its own game), but why else have 3D if you’re not going to offer something one can’t experience in the 2D version?

    Audio Rating: 4/5

    The DTS-HD Master Audio 1.0 sound mix has been nicely engineered to remove any age-related hiss, crackle, or other audio artifacts. There isn’t much bass to the mix, but dialogue has been solidly recorded and is presented here without the music score or the sound effects intruding on the viewer’s understanding.

    Special Features: 2.5/5

    Isolated Score Track: offered in DTS-HD Master Audio 2.0 stereo.

    Theatrical Trailer (1:39, HD): Edmond O’Brien himself introduces the picture to the viewer.

    Six-Page Booklet: some excellent black and white stills, the colorful poster art on the back cover, and film historian Julie Kirgo’s interesting take on the film and its impact in 3D.

    Overall Rating: 3/5

    Man in the Dark may not rank high in the annals of film noir, but as a 3D experience, it’s a lark and for those with the at-home capability, completely and enthusiastically recommended.

    Reviewed by: Matt Hough
    Support HTF when you buy this title:

    • Reed Grele, Doug Bull and dana martin like this


    25 Comments

    Another great review Matt.

     

    I should get my copy in about a week and after reading your review I just can't wait.

     

    Please keep these 3D titles from the golden age coming. 

     

    Doug.

    Interesting. This is something I can easily consider as a 3D title to bring in for my birthday. In fact, I will go ahead and add this to my birthday movie list. Thanks for this, Matt. Keep 'em coming, please!!!
    Photo
    Ronald Epstein
    Jan 18 2014 11:20 PM

    I am intrigued by the 3D aspect of this film.  Just did an Amazon search for

    it and could not find the title.

     

    Just want to see how expensive it is before deciding upon a blind purchase.

    $29.95 plus shipping from Twilight Time (Screen Archives Entertainment).

    Photo
    Ronald Epstein
    Jan 19 2014 12:21 AM

    Aaaah, okay, I had thought for some reason this was a Criterion release.

     

    My apologies.  That makes sense.  Thanks, Jose.

    Aaaah, okay, I had thought for some reason this was a Criterion release.

    My apologies. That makes sense. Thanks, Jose.

    A Criterion 3D? Now that would be worth waiting for. Wondering if they are thinking about it. Warhol's Frankenstein would be interesting.
    Photo
    Bob Furmanek
    Jan 21 2014 09:44 AM

    They are licensing titles from Universal. I suggested the Sirk and Boetticher 3-D titles: TAZA, SON OF COCHISE and WINGS OF THE HAWK.

      • ahollis, JoHud and bujaki like this

    A Criterion 3D? Now that would be worth waiting for. Wondering if they are thinking about it. Warhol's Frankenstein would be interesting.

     

    They already issued a 3D disc within the last year or so - Pina. No, not your typical Hollywood blockbuster or Golden Era title, but the 3D was very effective.

     

    I reviewed the disc in 2012. You can find the review here.

    They already issued a 3D disc within the last year or so - Pina. No, not your typical Hollywood blockbuster or Golden Era title, but the 3D was very effective.

    I reviewed the disc in 2012. You can find the review here.


    Thanks. I was not aware of it.
    Photo
    Bob Furmanek
    Jan 23 2014 10:30 AM

    Here is an interview by the DVD Savant with 3-D Film Archive Technical Director, Greg Kintz.

     

    http://worldcinemapa...d-film-archive/

      • Reed Grele likes this
    Photo
    Keith Cobby
    Jan 25 2014 09:05 AM

    I cannot decide whether to get this. I have seen the film (it has its merits but is not a great film) but do not expect to have 3-D capability until next year. How does the image quality compare with The Big Heat which is my benchmark for a b & w blu-ray from TT.

    Photo
    Bob Furmanek
    Jan 25 2014 09:24 AM

    MITD looks outstanding.

     

    For a film that was done in nineteen days - six of them on location - with a new un-tested camera rig, the 3-D is excellent.

     

    Outside of occasional left/right sizing issues, the new Blu-ray is very good. It's highly recommended.

    Photo
    Ronald Epstein
    Jan 25 2014 12:27 PM

    Just finished watching Man In The Dark.

     

    It's a fairly short film, coming in at 70 minutes.

     

    Not a bad film.  Not a great film. I sort of laughed at the exaggerated level of dialogue.  The

    effects look as if they were done on a shoe-string budget.  You can clearly see the wire on

    a bird that comes shooting outwards, and later, attached to a crawling spider.

     

    The sequence where Steve Rawley is being chased by cops, first on the ground and then

    across several rooftops, was clearly shot on the Paramount Studios lot.  You can see the

    tops of the sound stages and the Hollywood sign in the background.  Found that kind of cool. 

     

    On the plus side, the quality of this transfer is just fantastic.  Beautiful, razor-sharp B&W

    imagery.  Nice black levels.  The film has been immaculately cleaned.  

     

    As far as the 3D is concerned, it excels in its level of depth, thanks in part to its placement

    of objects.   Depth wise, this is one of the best classic 3D releases I have seen.

     

    However, as far as forward projection is concerned, it fails for me.  

     

    There are a few blatant attempts to move objects outwards at the audience.  They include

    things like surgical tools and a lit cigar.  However, the objects never really seemed to break

    the confines of the screen, and in an attempt to do so, became too blurred to have any

    profound effect on the viewer.  Faces of characters seem to poke themselves outwards more

    effectively than the objects that are purposely lunged forward.

     

    In all, just for level of depth, Man In The Dark is an excellent 3D film.  On the other hand,

    I have seen outward projection done much more effectively with other golden age classics

    released over the past two years.  Even some of the material from the golden age of 3D that

    Bob Furmanek has shown me privately (and with the HTF meet group), does much better

    with outward projection than what you see here.

     

    The only reason I am harping on this, is because someone in another thread was raving

    about the "In Yo' Face" aspect of Man In The Dark.  Sorry...it just wasn't that good, or at

    least, as effective as it should have been.

      • Johnny Angell likes this
    I enjoyed it very much. I hope it sells well and Twilight will give us more classic 3D.
    Photo
    Charles Smith
    Jan 25 2014 08:09 PM

    Amen, brother.

    Photo
    Ronald Epstein
    Jan 25 2014 10:50 PM

    Since the studios are unwilling to do it themselves, for the most part, we really do

    need more channels to get classic 3D content to the consumer.

     

    Let's hope Twilight Time can accomplish this.  

     

    I love watching this stuff.  The classic 3D releases are generally better than the

    modern 3D titles.

      • ahollis likes this

    There are still plenty of good titles out there.

     

    I'm hoping Warner gives us "Kiss Me Kate" some time this year.

     

    Doug.

      • Jon Lidolt and ahollis like this

    There are still plenty of good titles out there.

     

    I'm hoping Warner gives us "Kiss Me Kate" some time this year.

     

    Doug.

     

    Me, too, but it bothers me we've not heard a thing about another 3D release from them. Didn't they practically announce the release a year ago of House of Wax when they released Dial 'M' for Murder?

    Photo
    Todd J Moore
    Jan 26 2014 05:54 AM

    Ron, for the most part, the only real problem with the outward projections are that they are too fast. The gunfight during the car chase works best, though a couple of the surgery shots work pretty well. Realistically, they should have held on the gimmick shots an extra five seconds to make them effective. All in all, I liked the disc and, I too, want much more classic stuff. I, too, am really hoping Warner does Kiss Me Kate. Anyone know where we can write them and ask about it?

    Photo
    Ronald Epstein
    Jan 26 2014 05:57 AM

     

    Ron, for the most part, the only real problem with the outward projections are that they are too fast. The gunfight during the car chase works best, though a couple of the surgery shots work pretty well.

     

     

     

    I would agree with that.

    Photo
    Johnny Angell
    Feb 10 2014 01:23 PM

    Just finished watching Man In The Dark.

     

    It's a fairly short film, coming in at 70 minutes.

     

    Not a bad film.  Not a great film. I sort of laughed at the exaggerated level of dialogue.  The

    effects look as if they were done on a shoe-string budget.  You can clearly see the wire on

    a bird that comes shooting outwards, and later, attached to a crawling spider.

     

    ….

     

    On the plus side, the quality of this transfer is just fantastic.  Beautiful, razor-sharp B&W

    imagery.  Nice black levels.  The film has been immaculately cleaned.  

     

    As far as the 3D is concerned, it excels in its level of depth, thanks in part to its placement

    of objects.   Depth wise, this is one of the best classic 3D releases I have seen.

     

    However, as far as forward projection is concerned, it fails for me.  

     

    First let me say that I violated my vow never to purchase from TT, I dislike their business model, to put it mildly.  I bought this movie because…well I'm a 3D whore.  I hope that casting aspersions upon myself does not violate forum rules.   :)

     

    Ron's comments I mostly agree with.  The transfer looked great.  There was good 3D depth.  The in-your-face factor, was however, disappointing.  If I did not already know it, I would guess that this was an early 3D film and the film makers were fumbling around while learning the craft.  I thought it particularly bothersome when the projecting surgical instruments would just disappear as a cut was made.

     

    I was surprised how much I disliked the film in general, even after being prepared for the fact that this was not a top film noir.  I wouldn't even give this film credit for being mid-level.  I'd give it a C- and I'm being generous at that.  The acting was generally mediocre or poor.  Even a top actor like Edmund O'Brien didn't do that well.  This movie was so light weight that the script must have been written on tissue paper.

     

    I know it was shot in a hurry, but I'm just judging what I saw on the screen.  Just not much there.  Had the 3D projections been better, I don't think I would have liked it any better.

     

    All IMHO of course.

    Photo
    Keith Cobby
    Feb 21 2014 02:13 AM

    The Mad Magician next please.

      • Josh Steinberg likes this
    Photo
    davidHartzog
    Feb 21 2014 04:02 AM
    Man in the Dark is a pretty awful film, and certainly not representive of good noir.A gimmick like 3d doesn't help.
    Photo
    Josh Steinberg
    Mar 02 2014 11:07 PM

    I had a lot of fun with this… it kinda pushed the limits of what my 3D TV can do, so there was a little ghosting and whatnot, but I think that was absolutely my equipment as opposed to a disc problem.  The movie itself - not exactly mind-blowing, but a fun b-movie nonetheless.  I don't think this was shown at the Film Forum in NYC a few years ago when they ran a three week marathon of 50s 3D titles in dual 35mm, but it would have fit right in with a lot of the titles shown then.  Well worth the $30 - hope Twilight Time keeps the vintage 3D coming!

    Just finished watching Man In The Dark.

     

     

     

    However, as far as forward projection is concerned, it fails for me.  

     

    There are a few blatant attempts to move objects outwards at the audience.  They include

    things like surgical tools and a lit cigar.  However, the objects never really seemed to break

    the confines of the screen, and in an attempt to do so, became too blurred to have any

    profound effect on the viewer.  Faces of characters seem to poke themselves outwards more

    effectively than the objects that are purposely lunged forward.

     

    The only reason I am harping on this, is because someone in another thread was raving

    about the "In Yo' Face" aspect of Man In The Dark.  Sorry...it just wasn't that good, or at

    least, as effective as it should have been.

     

    Watched it last night. The in-your-face scenes worked fine for me. I could reach out and touch them. I freeze-framed them and they all looked fine except for the spider which was a bit blurry. The 1.33:1 image is 93 by 70 inches from my Panasonic AE8000 front projector. I sit about 14 feet from the wall - no screen and it looks great!